|
|
Post by Riyan Code on Apr 22, 2006 13:07:33 GMT -5
Ok, both of them suck, but I was working on them at the same time over the course of like 10 mins, so.... I like both of them, one a little more then the other, but I was hoping to get your thoughts on them. Please crit me on both and say which one you like better. They are pretty much the same minus the background and the effects. Picture 1:  Picture 2:  |
|
|
|
Post by Josh Green on Apr 22, 2006 13:11:49 GMT -5
Yes, they are both kinda wierd too....
|
|
|
|
Post by Aurora Feare on Apr 22, 2006 13:15:16 GMT -5
They are both kinda wierd, but cool too.
I like the second one better, though..It's slightly easier to Riyan's name cause of the contrast of the color to the background..o.o
|
|
|
|
Post by Josh Green on Apr 22, 2006 13:18:21 GMT -5
Yeah I know, I was messing around with like putting a shiny effect on the name in the first one, but it darkened the rest of the picture and when I lightened it, it looked wierderer.
I kinda like the person from the first picture and the background from the second picture...
|
|
|
|
Post by Aurora Feare on Apr 22, 2006 13:20:48 GMT -5
Oh.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ulysses Swynford on Apr 22, 2006 18:47:40 GMT -5
I'm not sure if you're making a signature or a picture to go with your profile. If it's the former then the 2nd picture of the girl would suit more rather than the first. Of course, the background has to fit with the style in which you project the image of the woman. I'm only saying this because I've been making sigs for a while now and I'm still in the process of learning. Here's a link of what I mean: That one has boxes...but honestly I got lazy with the extraction of Nemu. Here's another one of her I did: I hope that helps (especially if you're using Photoshop 7/CS) |
|
|
|
Post by Delos A. Clayr on Apr 24, 2006 14:53:21 GMT -5
Personally, I prefer the second one. It's more subtle than the first and it seems more...'classic'.
*Shrugs*
Hello by the way!
|
|
